Grammaticality.

grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jan 24, 2020 at 9:53. Infinity. asked Jan 24, 2020 at 8:33. Infinity Infinity. 656 1 1 gold badge 5 5 silver badges 12 12 bronze badges. 3. Ich glaube, die Überschrift stimmt nicht mit der dann ausformulierten Frage überein.In general, I think people use "two times more likely" to mean the same thing as "two times as likely" and "twice as likely," but I believe I've encountered a peeve where people object to this use of "two times more likely" and say that it "logically" should mean "three times as likely" (because one plus two is three).• Grammaticality is not based on meaningfulness • Grammaticality is not based on truthfulness. Sentence Structure • We could say that the sentence “The child found the puppy” is based on the template: Det—N—V—Det—N – But this would imply that sentences are just strings of words without internal structure ...This article takes a critical look at grammaticality judgment tasks in second language acquisition research. It begins by examining the theoretical assumptions that underlie grammaticality judgment tasks, pointing out that previous studies have reported considerable differences between the results obtained from grammaticality judgment tasks and from other, production-oriented tasks.

Poorly written statements are often too broad and lack description of the actual company. They may be too long, too ambitious and/or riddled with grammatical errors. McDonald’s, for another example, failed to run a simple grammar check.As for User 2, opinions on grammaticality coming from anonymous speakers of anonymous languages in anonymous countries are another thing I frequently disregard. We see very strange (but equally strongly held) opinions on English grammaticality issued by English language students all the time here. -

Grammmaticality is the state or quality of being grammatical, or the difference between grammatical and grammaticalism. Learn the origin, synonyms, and related words of …

Grammaticality and comprehensibility. As pointed out previously, grammar is not an absolute issue. While grammatical . accuracy exists as clear dichotomy, that is, grammatical or ungrammatical ...Jan 8, 2016 · The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35 ( 3 ), 423 – 449. doi: 10.1017/S0272263113000041 CrossRef Google Scholar. Henning, G. ( 1987 ). A guide to language testing: Development, evaluation, research. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House. In this paper we develop a simple online survey technique for collecting grammaticality judgments. Our primary target audience is the set of formal ...26 nov 2014 ... Great Ideas in Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgements · I ate the carrot yesterday. This sounds pretty good to me. I'd say it's “grammatical”. · * ...

Acceptability and grammaticality. The goal of acceptability rating studies is to gather insights into the mental grammars of participants. As the grammaticality of a linguistic construction is an abstract construct that cannot be accessed directly, this type of tasks is usually not called grammaticality, but acceptability judgment. This can be ...

Thus conceived, speaker–hearers are portrayed as individuals who possess linguistic knowledge and can provide judgments concerning the grammaticality of certain sentences Footnote 2 while it is generative linguists’ task to work out the system of rules that ‘expresses his [a native speaker’s] knowledge of his language’ Footnote 3 ...

grammaticality; articles; Share. Improve this question. Follow asked Sep 28, 2014 at 21:48. Cees Timmerman Cees Timmerman. 713 6 6 silver badges 20 20 bronze badges. 15. 9. If it was pronounced /'unikorn/ instead of …1 Answer. "Acceptability" is about speaker judgments of utterances, whether they "accept" a stimulus. "Grammaticality" is not about speakers, it is about the abstract grammar that describes a language – does the grammar generate the output. However, there is a tendency (more than minor) for linguists to slip from acceptability to grammaticality.grammaticality; prepositions; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Sep 10, 2012 at 18:17. RegDwigнt. 96.9k 39 39 gold badges 308 308 silver badges 400 400 bronze badges. asked Nov 9, 2010 at 21:02. Anderson Silva Anderson Silva.Jan 17, 2013 at 14:14. 1. But @BillFranke the OP is asking whether the second line can be used at all ("The people (of which there are many, many)"). My answer is no, it can't, but I couldn't tell you why. Good question. – JAM. Jan 17, 2013 at 14:51. 1. @JAM: Sure the second line can be used in colloquial English.Hey, George . . . Beginning a sentence with Hey, is pretty conclusively diagnostic of an amicable colloquial register largely unconstrained by the niceties of formal expository prose.. In that context the sentence is unimpeachably "grammatical", at least in American speech. Couple without of is acceptable AmE.. Hey, George, we're headin over to the VFW for a couple beers.GRAMMATICALITY 5 possible and impossible in English, is too horrifying to be entertained for long. In most of the passages in which Chomsky discusses grammaticality, it is also true that he is ultimately concerned not with sentences in isolation, but with series of sentences to which given transforms may or may not be applied.

For example, I might write up (or do a write-up on) an event by writing down a list of people who attended. "Writing things down" denotes taking an informal note or summarizing. "Writing things up" denotes taking some idea and turning it into a formal report or complete document. Highly active question.grammaticality; tense. Featured on Meta New colors launched. Practical effects of the October 2023 layoff. Linked. 0. Is "the first time" a type of signposting language or something like that? Related. 6. Tense to use for a past event that is still relevant at the present time ...As the accepted answer implies, "product #55 has not sold" is a (possibly informal and/or grammatically "incorrect") abbreviation of "product #55 has not been sold". It may have been withdrawn from sale, or it may still be available but nobody has yet bought it. That usage would apply to a single item, which (obviously) can only be sold once.Grammaticalization has been defined as "the change whereby lexical items and constructions come in certain linguistic contexts to serve grammatical functions, and, …I messaged you this morning. I will message you in the morning. Note that you'd only use this morning if it were the same day that you messaged the person. in the morning can be used in more situations. Being past tense, if you had some other way to indicate the date, in the morning would be okay.grammaticality; sentence-fragments; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jan 22, 2016 at 19:49. Milo P. 1,337 9 9 silver badges 16 16 bronze badges. asked Jan 22, 2016 at 18:54. Albert Simpson Albert Simpson. 11 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 2 2 bronze badges. 2. 2.Which of the following sentences contains the grammatically correct bolded section: "He affected me and my friend's day."or "He affected my and my friend's day.". It seems clear to me that the first sentence clearly sounds the best, but I was always told that you should be able to isolate the sentence to just one of the objects, i.e. remove my friend from the sentence, and when I do that, only ...

Grammaticality judgments reflect a compound product of both grammatical and processing factors. But because they interact in a symbiotic way, very often grammatical and processing constraints are difficult to separate. According to generally accepted grammatical theory, (a) ...grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow asked Sep 9, 2020 at 17:43. Questioner Questioner. 113 2 2 gold badges 3 3 silver badges 7 7 bronze badges. 2. Your two examples seem to differ only in the word "rather", which, in that context, means approximately "on the contrary".

The two expressions that are idiomatic in this context are "why" or "for what reason", with the former being the preferred option. "For why" (also hyphenated or written as one word) meaning "why" as a direct interrogative was used in Old and Middle English (see the MED's entry), but it became obsolete sometime around the year 1500. Other senses of the expression (for example, it was used as a ...It's perfectly correct. While, based on Ngrams, multiple different is a construction which has seen a fairly recent increase in use, starting in roughly 1980, many different means essentially the same thing and has been around for many years. The word multiple itself has undergone a recent increase in use, as well, so my guess is that this …You appear to have decided that but not is a constituent, instead of just being two words that merely abut each other.But is indeed a coordinating conjunction, but not is a negative and attaches to the sentence that's been deleted by Conjunction Reduction (q.v.), viz, either You can turn everybody against you, but you can never turn your boss against you or You can turn everybody against you ...Note that when "either" is used as a determiner, the plural is clearly ungrammatical: "either *plans". In all cases, "either" means "one of two". This means that technically, it is always singular. Compare: A herdNOUN is a good choice. / ItPRON is a good choice. OnePRON is a good choice. EitherPRON is a good choice.grammaticality; syntactic-analysis; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited May 18, 2018 at 5:42. JJJ. 7,138 18 18 gold badges 38 38 silver badges 58 58 bronze badges. asked Aug 19, 2015 at 13:55. ivanz ivanz. 163 1 1 gold badge 2 2 silver badges 5 5 bronze badges. 2. 2. Yes.Grammaticality should not be confused with notions of correctness or acceptability as determined by prescriptive grammarians."Grammaticality is a theoretical term," says Frederick J. Newmeyer: "a sentence is 'grammatical' if it is generated by the grammar, 'ungrammatical' if it is not" (Grammatical Theory: Its Limits and Its Possibilities, 1983).

Abstract. Ever since Pereira (2000) provided evidence against Chomsky’s (1957) conjecture that statistical language modelling is incommensurable with the aims of grammaticality prediction as a research enterprise, a new area of research has emerged that regards statistical language models as “psycholinguistic subjects” and probes their ...

grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited May 3, 2011 at 12:56. Uticensis. 21.7k 69 69 gold badges 150 150 silver badges 239 239 bronze badges. asked May 3, 2011 at 12:42. xzhu xzhu. 2,620 11 11 gold badges 33 33 silver badges 48 48 bronze badges. 5. 1.

and proceeds to show me: Definite article + plural noun: Die Männer = The Men. Yes, that's referring to the Nominative (not the other cases) The second table is about the declination of the definite article / all cases of the plural, and the example: Ich will nicht nur mit den Männern arbeiten. is an example of Dative case.The grammaticality judgment test The mean score for the GJT and the standard deviation of all the groups on the pre-test and post-test for this test are displayed in Table 3 . The mean scores in Table 3 indicate that the TBLT group, followed by the PPP group, had the highest increase in the means.grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38. Community Bot. 1. asked May 22, 2011 at 20:10. Stanley Stanley. 361 1 1 gold badge 5 5 silver badges 14 14 bronze badges. 1. Lunch is mainly contributed on eating meals in afternoon session. - user66337.Grammatically, "I panicked" simply uses the intransitive verb "to panic" in the past-tense form. "I was panicked" is more complicated to analyze. As Edwin Ashworth's answer indicates, in principle, it could be seen as either a standard "eventive/dynamic" passive construction, or as a "stative/static" construction where "panicked" can be ...In this paper we develop a simple online survey technique for collecting grammaticality judgments. Our primary target audience is the set of formal ...Require with an agent subject can take an infinitive complement with B-Raising. That means no for, since that's the mark of an unRaised subject: A has required B to effect a change is grammatical. It can also take an untensed that-complement (what used to be called "the subjunctive"), but in this case the that complementizer cannot be deleted: A has required that B effect a change is OK, but ...1. "I'm home" means "I have arrived at home" (after being away for while, for instance after a trip, or after working in an office the whole day). In the phrase "I'm home", the word "home" is used as an adverb, not a noun. Compare the expression "to go home". Example: in the movie Star Wars: The Force Awakens, when Han Solo and Chewbacca set ...The expression to a lesser extent meaning "less strongly or not so much" is commonly found with the comparative form of less.. Curiously, Google Books shows that "to a less extent" was initially, from the beginning of the 19c., the more common form and that only decades later the "lesser" form became the more commonly used. Nowadays most dictionaries suggest the use of "lesser ...People in my workplace are using that term more and more. It sounds completely wrong to me. Here are some examples: We will investigate and revert back as soon as possible. Will reschedule and revert back! Please let me know who will be able to go and who won't by COB tomorrow so that I can revert back to her.

Yes, it's correct. It's like this: He had had a lot of faith, but it had had no effect.There's a clause break after the second had showing where faith is sposta occur, but it's been moved to the front, changed to which or that, and subsequently deleted in the relative clause all the faith (which) he had had.The next had had is just the main verb phrase; the whole NP before it is the subject.Well formed; in accordance with the rules of the grammar of a language. correct. acceptable. allowable. idiomatic. well formed. “It makes a grammatical sentence that correctly expresses the intended meaning.”. Find more words! With parts of be and modals (can, should etc), the two forms. Isn't he, won't you, shouldn't they. and. Is he not, will you not, should they not. are in free variation. Some people rarely use the uncontracted forms, but others use both, with sometimes the uncontracted form being a little stronger, or just more formal.It's absolutely fine to use because and if consecutively in a sentence.. The word because heads a phrase that contains a subordinate clause (some grammars recognise because as a preposition, others call it a subordinating conjunction). This phrase has the function of Adjunct in the sentence (read adverbial).. Notice that the Adjunct can come before or after the clause that it modifies:Instagram:https://instagram. bud walkertruman cabinettennis competitors of tulsacantor diagonalization notion of (un)grammaticality, on the one hand, and the observations of (un)acceptability ratings, on the other, can entertain in fact rather complex interactions. That is, the relation between trugreen organic lawn careku structural engineering conference Grammaticality judgments represent one of the earliest forms of data elicitation in L2 research, in large part, due to the early dependence of the field on linguistically-focused research where understanding grammars of the world’s languages was often determined by asking speakers of those languages whether specific sentences are acceptable ... doiron Singular (or epicene) ‘they’ has a long history as a pronoun to refer to individuals of unknown gender (Balhorn, 2004), and has also been adopted as a personal pronoun by those who identify as neither male nor female. Borthen (2010) argues based on a corpus study of Norwegian that, crosslinguistically, plural pronouns allow for vague ...His or her own, ‘on the ground’ direct experience. ‘As of now’ is often used to report direct, step by step progress: Workman: ‘As of now, we can see the cable, and we’ll be connecting it to the router shortly’. Reporter: ‘As of now, the suspects have been isolated in the building, by the police’.